The title of the article says a lot: John Lewis chief calls on government to tax multinational companies properly:
The John Lewis Partnership boss, Andy Street said that there is an unfair advantage exercised by TNC's who are 'domiciled' abroad -often in tax havens and certainly for the purposes of aggressive tax avoidance. They have an unfair advantage over British-based rivals because of the foreign companies have low tax bills meaning that they can spend more on investment in research and development and begin to steal a march.
So if we want there to be British based employment, manufacturers etc, it would be because we'd like for our wealth not to be constantly being expatriated to tax havens and the global 'few'. If we allow this expatriation to continue, it is to consent in our own impoverishment. If we let it continue, we're allowing corporate asset stripping of the nation.
The business case is the other side of this observation. If we value SMEs, we need to plot against the unfair advantage the combination of tax rules and existing wealth delivers to the TNC's. In principle it's the same as anti-monopoly legislation and policies: countering the accumulation of economic power because it tends towards rentier behaviour and the exploitation of others.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment