The philosophy behind it, from my point of view, is
slightly sophisticated. In overview; it is rooted in scientific research on
exercises involving focus on breath and awareness of one's own consciousness.
As the person who leads this particular package of exercises, and as a
Christian I understand what I'm doing as in Christian terms. I think that
self-awareness is an important discipline for Christians to develop in order
for us to become aware of how we do and don't follow God's will (even into the
recesses of our personal formation) and to help us to become more conscious of
God's presence in our everyday life.
These exercises can help us to cultivate those
awarenesses.
However, these sessions are open to people who don't
necessarily share a Christian commitment because I think, based on the
scientific evidence, that the exercises can help people develop better mental
and emotional health and because I believe that Christian faith calls us to 'do
good to all', offering something like this is part of a broader Christian
outreach. I occasionally talk with people about how they link up with Christian
faith. Within the sessions themselves, I just use exercises that can be
accessed by a wide variety of people with no particular content that requires a
specific faith commitment.
As a Christian I see mind-body wholism as a part of the
heritage of our faith reaching back into Hebrew anthropology and exemplified in
the philosophical commitments that the churches of the first four centuries recognised
as consistent with Christian commitment. That mind-body wholism leads me to
expect that by engaging in certain kinds of psycho-somatic exercises, people would
gain some health benefits. It is no surprise, either, therefore, to discover
that by engaging in exercises of this kind, Christians can also find things that
can help to mature their own discipleship of Christ.
On a more personal note, my own engagement in these
exercises came through recognising that the effects and some of the component
parts were actually part of practice and experience of many Christians, myself
included. It was just that taking them out of the familiar context of a
specific spiritual tradition made them seem somewhat unfamiliar at first.
Now, of course, there are others who might lead a range
of exercises such as I do who don't share a Christian faith. And, of course,
they would have to work out for themselves how they square the scientific
results with their own philosophies. In what I've written above, I hope I've
given you an indication of how it seems to me that these exercises can fit
within a Christian understanding of the world.
Further comments
My response ended at the last paragraph, but a few further comments might be called for. There is in this response an implicit view of the relationship between the philosophical entails of Christian commitments and the 'public square': I'm not an exclusivist in this respect: I think that because world-views are seeking to explain the world which is a common heritage, there are enormous overlaps of explanations. In fact, missionally, I see these as the reason we can, as Christians, engage in conversations about how we collectively 'do' society and expect that sometimes our views can gain some degree of collective acceptance -because there is common ground in the human experiences of ourselves, our bodies, minds and the world. But maybe that's another post ...
No comments:
Post a Comment