Guardian Unlimited | Economic dispatch |: "The same directors who have been awarding each other huge double digit increases for years are not prepared to see their own workers earn more than a splutter above �4.85p an hour. That is not a lot of money."
Got a point. I've no quibble with people being able to enjoy the rewards of their labour or of their ideas or of their investments, but I do have a quibble with the gall of using unequal power to exploit some and over-compensate oneself. Such pay differentials offend natural justice; the only justification is that some people have the power to extract that money [because they are directors] and some people don't. It would be a fair question to ask who is puttting in the most effort.
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment