The idea that the World Trade Centre was destroyed or allowed to be destroyed by the Bush administration has been around for a little while, and I suspect that, like the JFK assasination, is likely to be around for a long time. Here's an article which outlines the basics. But the hallmarks are political capital could be made, plausible-sounding alternative explanations for details, distrust of government and global business interests. Of course, on their own, also, most of those things may be right or have something right about them. It's the total mix that sounds off the wall. And yet ...
Perhaps, like the princes in the tower, we will never know for sure.
USA :: 9/11 book from church publishing house causes uproar
Filed in: Twin_Towers, 9/11, conspiracy
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"
I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...
-
I've been watching the TV series 'Foundation'. I read the books about 50 years ago (I know!) but scarcely now remember anything...
-
from: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/online/2012/5/22/1337672561216/Annular-solar-eclipse--008.jpg
-
"'Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell yo...
No comments:
Post a Comment