The idea that the World Trade Centre was destroyed or allowed to be destroyed by the Bush administration has been around for a little while, and I suspect that, like the JFK assasination, is likely to be around for a long time. Here's an article which outlines the basics. But the hallmarks are political capital could be made, plausible-sounding alternative explanations for details, distrust of government and global business interests. Of course, on their own, also, most of those things may be right or have something right about them. It's the total mix that sounds off the wall. And yet ...
Perhaps, like the princes in the tower, we will never know for sure.
USA :: 9/11 book from church publishing house causes uproar
Filed in: Twin_Towers, 9/11, conspiracy
Nous like scouse or French -oui? We wee whee all the way ... to mind us a bunch of thunks. Too much information? How could that be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Bible in a Disenchanted Age -a brief review
Why this book? For me? -I've been finding myself wanting to wrestle more and more with the interface between scholarly questions and de...
-
Interesting insight into the Muslim world: my favourite progresive muslim site has been hacked and attacked by islamists accusing those who ...
-
Some readers will recall that I'm keen in principle on a thorough review of the way we do dioceses in the CofE. I'm not starry-eyed...
-
This book is one that I now seriously consider recommending to the student Christian groups I'm in touch with whose basis is Evangelic...
No comments:
Post a Comment