30 June 2006

Black leaders blast megachurches, say they ignore social justice

Prominent black leaders have denounced increasingly popular megachurches, saying many have abandoned Jesus' emphasis on social justice to preach a gospel of wealth and self-help.

Christianity :: Black leaders blast megachurches, say they ignore social justice

Petroleum-Free Polymers from Fructose

producing plastics this way might require some investment, but the long-term gain would be that the process is much cleaner than petroleum-based methods. While using petroleum dumps new carbon dioxide into the air, the carbon dioxide released when extracting chemicals from plants is created from molecules that are already in the ecosystem.

In fact, would this not be a kind of carbon sequestration?
WorldChanging: Tools, Models and Ideas for Building a Bright Green Future: Petroleum-Free Polymers from Fructose
Filed in: , , ,

Lazy atheism and bishops

If that title doesn't get your attention, what will? This post flags up an article that appeared today in the Guardian which has some interesting things to say about the Church of England from a friendly-atheist perspective. But, oh dear, Simon Jenkins gives an outing to several lazy atheist myths on the way. So I propose to comment on those first before having a look at the interesting and constructive things in this article.

So, first up, he says:
Atheism fields no armies, but Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism and Islam most certainly do. Never was a bigger lie told than that the Pope has no divisions.

What? Surely he can't be serious? Atheism fields no armies? Yet the armed forces of the PRC and of North Korea serve officially atheist regimes [not to mention the officially secular -and so kinda atheist- armies of the USA and France and India etc etc ...] ... and I can't think of any armed force currently engaged as a Christian army unless perhaps 'Christian' is doing duty as a kind of ethnic label, and ditto Hindu. I suspect the same is true of Judaism since Israel is officially a secular state and the most religious of Jews tend to be against the state of Israel... So not the easy goal he thought, potentially and own goal in fact.

It's good knock about rhetoric but it's flawed, I think:
Under Tony Blair's unequal extradition treaty, if Dr Williams opposes the appointment he could be "extraordinarily rendered" from Lambeth Palace to a New Jersey courthouse, thus fulfilling the Pilgrim Fathers' wildest dreams.

I take the point but I think that expressing an opinion is not covered, and the main point is that the ABofC has no power except that of moral suasion to oppose the appointment. He may advise that it is not a good idea but he has no other means to oppose it; the provinces of the Anglican communion are independent and held together voluntarily.

And this is a bit of selective reading if ever I saw it.
Rustle through the cuttings and you will see that almost all the Church's bad news involves bishops. Their appointments are controversial, if not cataclysmic, be they leftwing, rightwing, gay or, worst of all, women. From "Bishop John" of Reading to Bishop Gene of New Hampshire and Bishop Katharine of Nevada, from Hereford's Mappa Mundi to Lincoln's vendetta and the impenetrable faction-fighting at Ripon, Trollope himself could not catalogue the mischief caused to the Anglican church by the episcopacy.

Well, it's debatable about the bad news and proportions thereof. But more importantly it takes for granted that the media's view of things ecclesiastical is the important one. But let's think about that for a moment, shall we? The press and other news media go for bishop stories precisely because bishops are the nearest thing that the press thinks we have to celebrities and politicians and the best kind of news is 'bad' news. Given those two factors, it would be interesting if we found that there were not a lot of 'bad' news bishop stories. Case not proven, I think. In any case I suspect that there are probably quite a lot of the bad news stories that don't involve bishops and that the episcopacy probably causes less mischief on balance than other members of the church, it's just that when they do, it's bigger news with bigger consequences. And that's allowing for the fact that I have personal experience of episcopal 'fallen-ness'!

With a faulty analysis comes a faulty solution:
bishops seem to be accidents waiting to happen. Dr Williams should admit as much and abolish the episcopacy. He would save £18m and no end of trouble worldwide.

Abolish bishops and the accidents waiting to happen devolves to figures that would take their place in the spotlight of media scrutiny, so perhaps keeping them and giving them good media training is a better solution. That's without considering that some of us actually think that episcopacy isn't inherantly a bad idea and could even be good if done right. The other things don't require bishops to be abolished: I have long advocated that all clergy should be paid the same and that the only differentials should be expenses of office. If the idea is to pay people so that they do not have to have another income, I can't see the logic of paying 'senior appointments' more, especially as we should be vocation-motivated. If the stipend is a grant /enablement to pursue a church-centred vocation, then need not the worldly valuing of an appointment should be at the heart of financial compensation policies. Part of the point of equalising the stipends of parish clergy was to eliminate, as I understood it, the unseemly scramble for better paid preferments and to enable people to pursue vocations to areas of a more 'missional' character without undue concern for the financial implications. This has largely been successful, I would judge and needs now to be extended to so-called senior appointments. That would achieve the savings -though I gather that they are unlikely to be as much as 18m quid under either scenario.

Then the guy says this:
The Church of England's safety valve is covert schism, its most effective discipline indiscipline. Yet its diplomacy is lumbering and hidebound. Lambeth still cannot make its peace with Rome, as have the Lutherans, or with Wesleyan dissent.

I really don't understand this: the Anglican church in Europe is in full communion with north European Lutheranism, and I'm not aware that either of us has entirely patched up the orgument with Rome, nor will we ever agree on the role of the pope, I suspect which for both Anglicans and Lutherans continues to be the big issue. And, as the CofE is actively and with some success, on the whole, managing raprochement with Methodism in Britain ... ?

So having raised the problems, what is there of value in this story? Well, there's a few things I would like to say that it is worth hearing from our friendly disagree-ers.

It will be no surprise, given what I wrote a few paragraphs back, that I think we should 'hear' this.
The Presbyterians were right. Bishops are a noisome and bureaucratic pestilence. They were the agents of ecclesiastical power when that power was many days' ride away from provincial England. They shared with monasteries vast territorial wealth, survived the Reformation and, even as the Church declined nationally, proliferated regionally, taxing subordinate parishes to maintain their style of living and governing.
It doesn't have to be that way, though. I believe in the bene esse of episcopacy: that is to say that if you don't have bishops, their equivalent tends to get invented: people who handle trans-local relationships between churches and perhaps represent groups of churches tend to appear. The way they are appointed and hold office may differ and the amount of doctrinal or ecclesiological freight they are invested with may vary but essentially, you have an 'apostolic ministry' of some kind.

I would say that we could learn something from the Moravians here. If I've observed things rightly, in the UK they have bishops who are ordinary parish clergy most of the time. I guess in CofE terms they are a bit like area/rural deans in terms of the way they hold two offices together. The real problem, as I see it, with CofE bishops is that we have the medieval princeling model still in mind. So we have too few of them. I would say that we should have loads of them, tiny dioceses but bishops who are more earthed in smaller local communities, paid the same as the rest of the clergy but with a wider responsibility for the pastoral care and ministerial development of the other clergy.

So when Simon Jenkins writes...
The middle ages, when everyone was supposedly an active Christian, coped with 20 bishops, and only six were added before the Victorian era. In 1845, there were 30; by 1945 the number had risen to 90. Today there are 114 bishops and suffragans. There is even talk of a third archbishop. This is missionary creep. I was once sent a diocesan agenda proposing an increase in head office staff of 24 and a matching cut of 24 in parochial clergy.
The problem is not how many bishops, it's how they function and how they are resourced and more widely than that, how they have been seen culturally within and outwith the church. It is worth reading Gareth Miller's radical proposal for a new provincial structure which I reproduced on my blog a little while back. It seems to me that he outlines some structures that along with my suggestion about stipends, could actually work. Oh and incidently, I think that a church with more ordained deacons [most of those currently exercising the office of Reader are, in all but name, functioning, in Anglican terms, diaconally, let's recognise that] but fewer stipended clerge might be part of what we do. Making room for more bi-vocationality in varying degrees from voluntary to fractional posts is part of the solution. Who knows even bishops who are part time teachers, or welders job-sharing episcopacy with a spouse or one or two other clergy.

So, I want to thank Simon Jenkins for raising the issues, even if sometimes with a degree of wrongly-informed rhetoric. It is important for us to see how others see us, and where they have a point, to address the concerns.

I just can't work out how to get the CofE as a whole to listen to these concerns.

Guardian Unlimited | Comment is free | Dr Williams should abolish bishops and end this missionary creep:
Filed in: , , ,

29 June 2006

Survey on trust in ID cards in europe

If you are an EU citizen, then you might like to join this consultation on ID cards:
The Future of Identity in the Information Society, a project to explore identity issues in Europe, has launched a survey to gauge Europeans’ attitudes about electronic identification programs. Online at www.surveymonkey.com /s.asp?u=431712121747, the survey asks how strongly one agrees or disagrees with statements such as how much one supposes issuing systems will be secure, the difficulty of using an electronic ID card and the value of exchanging data about cardholders among governments and businesses.

Quite important to give it a go. It's not hard [though watch out for a couple of slightly confusing double negative questions] and not long.
Survey on trust in ID cards in europe (ML)

Filed in: , , ,

Video link churches and the Papacy of Celebrity

I both agree and disagree with this article. The agreement is fundamental: that we ignore the connotative meaning of our media at our peril. I disagree that
A televised event doesn’t communicate anything about a person’s character. It can only affirm or deny talent and attractiveness
, I think that the example is weak and does not necessarily carry that connotation; it overstates things. However, I do tend to think that the writer is right with this.
the extensive financial outlay required to pull off a video-venue service communicates to the congregation that only a preacher with a golden tongue has authority to preach the gospel. It conveys the unspoken belief that no one in the satellite congregation has the authority to speak to their context because preaching requires unique talents that only a few actually possess. Like the wizard in The Wizard of Oz, only the larger-than-life giants, painted by pixelated light, and hovering above the congregation, possess these elusive talents. The medium itself nurtures an elite priestly class in which the preacher is set apart from the people. With video venues, we can say goodbye to the priesthood of all believers and hello to the papacy of celebrity.


However, we do need to be careful at this point: the problem I see here is that a particular approach to worship has been hypered by the medium. As McLuhan was trying to say with 'the medium is the message', technology extends our abilities: it amplifies certain aspects of our abilities. In this case it amplifies the ability to project ones voice and image to a greater number of people at once. This does tend to have the effect of heightening 'celebrity', in effect. But it doesn't damn the use of video per se; just problematises that kind of use, and I agree that magnifying the office of preacher like that is perhaps not a good strategy and amplifies some of the worst tendencies of modernist-framed church culture. It's also a rather unimaginitive use of the possibilities: simply to do what we did before only bigger and more -dare I say?- oppressive.

But what if we used video imput more ambiently? Or to bring to bear things that would otherwise be hard to convey [a chat with a mission partner in Ethiopia, or a demonstration of just how things are in the downtown area the church is proposing to do some justice and social care work in], or to simply use graphic effects to expand the appreciation of liturgy and song or to help people remember better what is said. But talking heads? Give us a break. Let's learn from the use of video in clubs, in concerts and so forth. Let's also think about how it can empower ordinary Christians.

On a slightly different tack, I think that perhaps what the writer is reacting against is out of a feeling that not having the physical presence of a preacher is somehow not right in worship. I actually think that that instinct, which I share is about the same kind of difficulty with having communion over the airwaves; somehow the relationality that is meant to be inherant in worship is being attenuated so much that God's creation of community is being comupromised. Or am I being a bit too precious and reactionary?
Leadership Blog: Out of Ur: Video Venues and the Papacy of Celebrity: Why changing the methods always changes the message:
Filed in: , , , ,

Get a grip Mr Darling!

It looks to me like there are certain influential figures in the British government who are proponents of the nuclear industry, for whatever reason, who just do not like the fact that there are substantial difficulties with the nuclear option and show no real sign of having listened to any of the objections other than financial. Take Alistair Darling:
One of the factors in nuclear is that the costs have got to be met. We know it is expensive but to have an energy review that says we are not going to do it, especially given the carbon problem we face, does not make any sense at all.

Alistair, the indications we've seen do address the 'buts' you have. The fact remains that if you really have the kind of government money that redeveloping nukes would require, you'd get more out of it helping to support efficiency measures and renewables or even sequestration. And that's before we consider that the carbon footprint of minikng, building and decommissioning nuke power plants is arguably higher than current carbon-burning options. Come on man! Get a grip. The fact is that energy security could trump plain security if we follow the nuke path: nuclear installations would not be a good thing to have if a terrorist organisation decided that flying planes or launching missiles at them would be a good way to further their agenda.

I could even be paranoid about things and say that given the security problems inherant in a plutonium economy, ID cards seem to be a potential tool to control populations and identify nuclear security risks, or that decisions to renew Trident might require a domestic nuclear industry ...

Guardian Unlimited Politics | Special Reports | The lights will go out if we avoid the nuclear option, says Darling:
Filed in: , , , ,

Abbey Nous -the blog

Just to announce that I've set up a blog specifically to deal with matters of 'Lord's prayer spirituality' with the aim that it "is for friends and waysharers who are exploring or committed to a spirituality based on the Lord's prayer to share info and insights." In due course I will add the earlier posts where relevant on this blog to Abbey Nous. This blog will continue to capture more general spirituality and growth materials.

28 June 2006

Thoughts from the future

Now we in the church ought to be doing the kind of exercise that this novellist has been up to of late, to help us think about how we use our efforts best in the near future. Look at this set of scenarios and think about the kind of knock-on effects they will have for the way people live, think about their lives, their spirituality and identities.
Trying to get into the head of a 28-year-old British professional circa 2016 — the people this novel is about — is an interesting exercise, even though people of this generation are easy enough to track down right now: the trouble is, if I ask them questions now, I'm asking a bunch of 18 year olds. Whereas what I'm interested in is what they'll be thinking when they're 28 ...
You were one year old when the Cold War ended. You were thirteen when the war on terror broke out, and eighteen or nineteen when Tony Blair was forced to resign as Prime Minister. You graduated university owing £35,000 in student loans, at a time when the price of entry into the housing market in the UK was over £150,000 (about 4-5 times annual income; the typical age of first time buyers was 35 and rising by more than 12 months per year). Unless you picked the right career (and a high-earning one at that) you can't expect to ever own your own home unless your parents die and leave you one. On the other hand, you can reasonably expect to work until you're 70-75, because the pension system is a broken mess. The one ray of hope was that your health and life expectancy are superior to any previous generation — you can reasonably expect to live to over a hundred years, if you manage to avoid succumbing to diseases of affluence.
For comparison, when I graduated university in 1986, I had no student loans, first homes cost £30,000— or about 2-2.5 times annual income — and the retirement age was 60-65. So it should be no surprise if the generation of 1988 has very different expectations of their future life from the generation of 1964.

Where does the church come in? How do we minister? How do we mission? What are the consequences of having congregation of people in this kind of position: financially, in terms of disposable time, family and social life, pastoral needs ... and what kinds of creative responses might we begin to think about [co-housing?]
And what about the things not mentioned: climate change beginning to bite big; the cult of age because all those boomers are well into a well-endowed retirement that we can only drool over ...

The comments are interesting too. Kinda makes you think that the collective head really can score some benefits over the lone genius.
Charlie's Diary: Thoughts from the coal face:
Filed in: , , ,

Spirituality and self-: obsession or transformation?

Quite a helpful follow-up reflection by one of the participants in 'The Monastery'. Worth reflecting on.
Spirituality is not about indulging in self-obsessed navel-gazing, but rather self-transformation through engagement with the other, whether understood as neighbour, or ultimately as God. The kingdom is not within but among us. The opportunity that the monks offered us was a chance to see that the religious life (and more broadly the life of faith) far from being an escape from reality, is in actual fact, a deeper engagement with the truly real. To follow a spiritual path is not to take the easy way out and withdraw from the world, but rather to choose a different and in fact far more challenging mode of being in the world. Learning this simple but profound truth has brought me out of myself, quite literally, into a fuller and more dynamic engagement with life. It has given me a sense of the urgent need to respond to what really matters. To get on with it. Now.

The whole article is worth a read. I met the guy when he was on interview at a Theological College I have been known to frequent. I felt that this article seems to be true to the man I met. My prayer goes with you Nick, as you pursue the paths for your next steps to fall upon.
Nick's writings - Sensing the Sacred - Silence:
Filed in: , , , ,

Anglican conflict may reconfigure communion

Now this is interesting. Recently Rowan Williams
predicted it [the Anglican communion] may need to reconstitute itself into a looser federation of a hard core of central "constituent" national churches willing to sign up to a full doctrinal covenant of shared beliefs and a ring of churches "in association" but outside the constitutional structure, accepting some, but not necessarily all, Anglican beliefs and disciplines. "It is not going to look exactly like anything we have known so far," he warned in the statement, which is being sent to the archbishops and presiding bishops of churches in the third-largest Christian denomination.

Which would be very bold and potentially restore some degree of fellowship with estranged and 'continuing' Anglican groups. I think that might be to the good. What would be interesting is what the associational structures would permit and outlaw: interoperable orders? How far? The interoperability of ordained people, at the end of the day is what in Anglicanism constitutes full communion since communion may be shared by any Trinitarian in Anglican churches ... For me also, the intriguing possibility that it would raise would be of badged 'Anglican' churches in partial communion with Canterbury operating in England. A third province by stealth? Probably not since the money would not flow from the official C of E to such bodies, but nevertheless a deal might be done on buildings, for example. Beyond that or alongside that, opens up the possibility of Anglican ecclesial missions where, perhaps, there is a valuing of episcopal oversight and an acceptance of various Anglican distinctives, but the practices fit ill with the ecclesial praxis of the CofE as currently configured. An example which has been on my mind of late would be a network of cell-like groups meeting like house churches who do not fit into the parish system and who do not have the kind of governance and financial structures that fit with the CofE, and yet would value a bishop's ministry and would like the connection with the wider historical church that episcopally ordained people could bring ...
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Williams predicts split to resolve Anglican conflict:
Filed in: , , ,

Updike: Books & Digitalisation

Thanks to Phil Johnson for this interesting report on John Updike's thoughts and worries about the way that literature gets treated on the net.
"In imagining a huge, virtually infinite wordstream accessed by search engines and populated by teeming, promiscuous word snippets stripped of credited authorship, are we not depriving the written word of its old-fashioned function of, through such inventions as the written alphabet and the printing press, communication from one person to another — of, in short, accountability and intimacy? Yes, there is a ton of information on the Web, but much of it is egregiously inaccurate, unedited, unattributed and juvenile."
I have to say that I wasn't, with all respect, that impressed. It rather reminded me of the complaints that were made when movable type print was invented making books cheaper and more available. The complaint about literacy and more freely available books was that it would stop people remembering -which meant learning 'properly'. And yet there is a further strange reversal in this comment of Updike's: for the things he decries, if I'm not mistaken, were things that were routine until cheap printing; we even see the sign in the Bible and early Church writings. There we see quotes not referenced and incorporated freely into text so that you have to be an astute and well-read person to know that they are quotes at times. Where's the accounability there? That kind of accountability is a modern invention. Now that's not to say it's a bad thing but it is to mitigate the potential moral panic. I'm really not sure, either, that the shoddiness of information on the net is something to be more worried about than the shoddiness of information in books -need I mention Erich Von Daniken or "Holy blood, holy grail" to take two examples from recent history? The issue is about how we assess information and actually, I think that the internet may be doing us a favour by making so much info available so easily it forces us to ask critical questions sooner in the research process.

Recently, I did an observational placement at a primary school for a week. One of the things that impressed me was that these kids were being taught something I was never taught but had to pick up for myself [don't get me started on the shortcomings of the education system I went through!] which is to distrust [in my case] books and articles and to look for the sources and the back story of things written. Now it is part of the elementary education our primary scholars get to help them find quality information from the internet. My education, using priviledged text books and the like, fostered a rather naive trust in the written word and a false comfort in the apparent intimacy of having an author in your head.

There are things to take from Updike's little tantrum about new technology,and that is to do with making sure that we do raise critical issues and foster good practice in referencing -something I try to do as far as possible in blogging- but the principles are not suspect just because the medium makes solid claims to authorship harder to distinguish at times.

Just another thought: in an age where we are, perhaps, more skeptical of the idea of the individual genius -as if they don't don't have a context and huge debts to their culture and compatriots- then perhaps we should be celebrating the return of knowledge and words back into the nexus from which they are borrowed and developed? There's no point being a genius, some would argue, if there is no-one to appreciate it but that may be the culture of celebrity speaking where being famous is an end in itself, but how far is the desire for authorial attribution about modernist and hyper-modernist 'fame'? What is a Christian desire for attribution? Is there a legitimate place for it? Personally, I would feel that it was stealing if someone deprived me of some livelihood by passing off my words or ideas as their own. On the other hand, I would like those words and ideas to be out there in such a way that, if they have merit or can help people, then I can be traced and asked to say more or explain better. Or, if they are wrong, I can be helped to understand how and learn ... to me, that's the real point of citation and accountability.
circle of pneuma: Updike on Books & Digitalisation:
Filed in: , , , , , , ,

Abbey Nous: Daily bread and GM terminator tech

I thought I'd use this posting to flag up that I've started a new blog for Lord's prayer related stuff. The idea is that this should supplement the Abbey Nous Wiki which I will use mainly for more full documents and links. But for the more topical and transient things and as a way to flag up stuff that might make it to the wiki in time, there's the blog. I'm hoping too, that in time, it may become the touching place for people interested in developing and strengthening a Lord's prayer spirituality. As the intro says:
this blog is for friends and waysharers who are exploring or committed to a spirituality based on the Lord's prayer to share info and insights.


The post I've highlighted here should give an idea of one area of concern: the way that contemporary commercial and technological developments affect issues of global justice and providence. There may also appear things from time to time which might also make it onto Nouslife ...
Abbey Nous: Daily bread and GM terminator tech
Filed in: , , , ,

27 June 2006

Muslims address silence on Europe attacks

This is an interesting article picked up by Religion News Blog about Muslim reactions to the idea that they should denounce the acts of terrorism by Islimist radicals. One of the main reasons offered for the quietness that many have felt there has been [not always entirely a fair representation] is this.
Why, many Muslims ask, should they have to speak out against, or apologize for, actions of radicals who do not represent them - people they do not even regard as true Muslims? Many find the very idea of being asked or expected to denounce such acts "extremely offensive and insulting," said Khurshid Drabu, a senior member of the Muslim Council of Britain.

Which is fine and I have a great deal of sympathy with it. Though I do have to say that I think that if there were a group of terrorists making the kind of impact Al Qaida seem to be making in the name of Christian faith which was leading to lots of people misuderstanding badly what I understood to be my faith, I would want to be making it known and to explain just how it is that these people misrepresent my faith and how the inner logics of my belief work actually against it or how they are misusing texts.

The problem is that while ordinary Muslims have been doing this, there has been a paucity of official leadership type statements -including fatwas [of which I think there have only been two and one of those turns out not to be]- which back up this gut reaction. And the difficulty is that the rest of us can't understand how it is that Islam at a more official level 'disarms' the rhetoric of The Base. The difficulty being, further, that according to what we can understand of how Islam works in terms of its texts, hermeneutics and jurisprudence, the inner logics of Islam seem to favour the Islamist positions. Now, it should be said right now that I dearly hope that this is not the case and that the texts that appear to endorse violent responses to non-Muslims and the hermeneutical tools that appear to lead to affirming the continuing validity of those texts are actually potentially dealable with in ways that promote peaceful and harmonious co-exsitence and honest and frank dialogue and argument. At the moment that appears not to be so, on the whole.

So I'm left thinking that actually it's more like what it said earlier in the article.
For some of the more than five dozen Muslims interviewed for this story in Amsterdam, Paris and London, it's a sense of shame, or even guilt, that innocents have been killed in the name of Islam; they say those feelings make them seek to be "invisible." For those lucky enough to have jobs, there is little time to protest or even write letters to newspapers. For others, there is fear of being branded anti-Islam in their communities.
And it is that latter point which is the most worrying.
Islam :: Muslims address silence on Europe attacks: Filed in: ,

26 June 2006

'Adapt or Bust' on Climate Change

Lloyd's of London have recently produced a report on climate change. Here's the big blow to the denialist lobby: a conservative instituion like Lloyds saying something like this.
the report's conclusions:
* We don't know exactly what impact climate change will have. But we do know that it presents society and the economy with an increasing level of uncertainty as it seeks to manage its risk.
* We believe that it is time for the insurance industry to take a more leading role in understanding and managing the impact of climate change.
* This means that the industry can no longer treat climate change as some peripheral workstream, simply to tick the regulatory and compliance box, or to support its public relations strategy.
* Instead, understanding and responding to it must become "business as usual" for insurers and those they work with. Failure to take climate change into account will put companies at risk from future legal actions from their own shareholders, their investors and clients.

WorldChanging: Another World Is Here: Lloyds of London: 'Adapt or Bust' on Climate Change: Filed in: , ,

culture affects us all spiritually

One of the things that I'm struck by and sometimes comment on when I help people to learn about post-modern spirituality, is that most of the stuff that Christians label 'new age' has fairly direct parallels in evangelical and charismatic sub-cultures: angels, celtic spirituality, commodification, and so forth. So, pleased was I to read John Morehead musing about emerging church and new spiritualities and making a pretty similar observation, only more focused on EC.
"This is our thesis: the socio-spiritual dynamics that surfaced in mainstream society in the 1980s with New Age spirituality are now being mirrored sociologically inside the church through EC. Please note we are not saying that the EC teaches New Age doctrines or that it is New Age in disguise. The EC and New Age are theologically poles apart. The parallels we draw concern their social phenomena: What New Age was for secular society, the EC is to Protestantism. Both the EC and New Age have arisen as reactions to very broad societal changes and cultural influences."

I particularly liked his careful statement about not jumping to too-easy conclusions but making a careful observation.

In a later articlette he looks at DIY spiritualities -what I have tended to deal with under the label 'post-modern spiritualities'- and makes a good summary observation [which would also work to some degree for evangelical and charismatic 'markets'].
Within these alternate spiritualities, we have discerned a broad spectrum of positions. There is a distinct "soft end" of the spectrum, which is very consumerist and faddish and pandered to with chic books and trinkets. But there is also a distinct "hard core" - those who are very savvy about the consumerist nature of spirituality and in fact despise its commercialisation. The hard core yearn for depth and integrity to their spirituality.

But it is worth noting that the fluffy, frothy dismissable thing we often in Christian circles associate with this DIY spirituality is not the only kind; and we have let down badly the 'hard core' seachers.

I also, in this connection want to draw attention to something Phil Johnson wrote recently about the way that the pick'n'mix approach to things, not least spiritual searching, has deeply affected the culture of spiritual consciousness in the west. I have said before that we need to recognise that so-called folk religion in the west has been changing from one which tends to reference Christian thought-forms and memes to one where more eastern memes are picked up. However, not without being transmuted in the process by the strange alchemy of cultural transfer. Phil says:
In New Age thought karma and rebirth have been reinterpreted in a human potential-upwards evolutionary manner. These three outlooks now help people to reshape their understanding of life and death and suffering. These outlooks differ in quite a few ways from the Christian teachings on the purpose of life, the problem of suffering and sin, and the resurrection.

Which means, of course, that in relating to it, we need not to be caught by the philosophical sleight of hand and end up thinking that we should be working our apologetics towards Buddhist/Hindu notions when in fact we should be more engaged with the evolutionary human potential stuff. I do have questions about how long this particular meme will last but we should be aware that karma etc are not quite the same.

Why might they not last? Well, the trend for Buddhism to be making more inroads may well mean a better understanding of the real teachings and reflection on karma and rebirth could grow. Also, the post-modern turn tends to problematise progress and the kind of evolutionary view hiding under these western recyclings is actually, if I mistake it not, simply the Enlightenment notion of Progress transposed into the key of Spirituality; I'm not sure it can withstand the interrogation it is already getting. I'm also skeptical of its longevity because it tends to be so dualist, and I think that 'emergentist' accounts of human nature will be the more plausible in the future and such 'detachable soul' [or whatever] ideas will simply fail to convince. That will go for more Cartesian Christian accounts too, btw.

So the apologetic task I think I am setting myself, is to develop an emergentist and Christian anthropology which has a corporate, embodied basis [not hard, we have never dropped the resurrection of the body from the creed] ... more later, I hope. How much later, I don't yet know.
MoreheadsMusings: The Emerging Church: Some Critical Issues:

Want to destroy the world?

If you're into disturbing and scary global scenarios and can avoid thinking about the suffering entailed in natural disastres [the etymology of that word in pertinent here] then this flash film of a computer simulation of a 100km asteroid impact on earth is sobering. As the linking comment says:
It's also worth noting that the asteroid is meant to be 100 kilometres across – ten times larger than the one that created the Chicxulub crater in Yucat�n, Mexico, which some believe caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. But then it's 6 times smaller than the one heading towards Earth in the movie Armageddon. It's certainly a very dramatic scenario and it doesn't look too good for us. It's good to know there are plenty of potential ways to deflect or destroy deadly asteroids.

New Scientist Technology Blog: Want to destroy the world?: Filed in:

Theology as a science

The people at Science & Theology News have been thinking about these experiments that look at prayer in relation to patients being prayed for. The article linked under the heading of this post has some helpful and valid points to make, among them this one which puts succinctly into words one of my misgivings about it all.
When scientists investigate the physical world — provided they ask the right questions and adopt sound scientific methodology — nature has no alternative but to yield its secrets. But applying that methodology to God — or to anyone else with a will of his own — is not a guarantee of success. God might simply decide not to cooperate.

The author of the article, Russel Stanard, rightly points out earlier in the article;
let us be clear that any positive correlation between prayer and a better outcome would not have amounted to proof of God’s existence. Persuasive evidence, maybe, but not out-and-out proof. An alternative explanation might have invoked some kind of direct telepathic link between the minds of the intercessor and patient — one that did not entail God as an intermediary.


In a further article, David G. Myers points out that
The Lord's Prayer, the model prayer for Christians that I pray every day, does not attempt to control a God who withholds care unless cajoled. Rather, by affirming God's nature and human dependence even for daily bread, it prepares one to receive that which God is already providing. Through prayer, people of faith express their praise and gratitude, confess their wrongdoing, voice their concerns, open themselves to the spirit, and seek the peace and grace to live as God's own people.


Just so: in attempting to investigate extraordinary providence, the ordinariness of God's providence is missed and we veer towards God-of-the-gaps approaches which is less than helpful in the ongoing apologetic and doctrinal tasks. It misses the way that God seemingly chooses to use the everyday humdrum means of this-worldly processes to achieve things: we should as Christians reflect on the fact that there are among us those who clearly have a vocation to be surgeons, GP's, paramedics, nurses, psychiatrists and the like; how is God intending to work in their vocations, do we think?

And that last quote is quite right too in affirming that there is a whole lot more to prayer than simply asking God for things or telling God to do stuff [!], in fact, really, we can't do intercessory prayer without relationship and listening, and double-blind tests don't really work with that, especially when the prayists will be at all sorts of different points in their own relating to God who may have other agendas for them than answering experimentor-inspired [rather than Spirit-inspired] prayers for tests that they may or may not have God's active approval to be part of in the first place. See what I mean?

Then in this article, Richard Swinburne makes the bold and perilous, but probably correct [read the context] claim that
Some people badly need to be ill for their own sake, and some people badly need to be ill to provide important choices for others. Only in that way can some people be encouraged to make serious choices about the sort of person they are to be. For other people, illness is not so valuable.

And, again, factoring that kind of consideration into the experimental hermeneutics and methodologies is not going to be easy. That's not to say, either, that we should not try or that we should be hostile to such studies. There may be valuable things to learn from them. We just have to be careful about what conclusions we draw and to be aware that in all probablity nothing is going to deliver the knock-out punch either for theism or atheism: it's all going to be a lot more subtle than that.

Science & Theology News - Theology as a science: Filed in: , , , ,

diet and performance

It should be no surprise to those who already think that human beings are whole and that mind, body and spirit are but aspects of the greater whole and that each will influence and affect the other in appropriate conditions. I used to work in a wholefood shop, and it's great to see the philosophy we worked by [that diet is important and can have significant effects on our health and performance] seems to be gaining support. In this case it is being touted that "teachers welcomed children eating healthier food which would improve their concentration and behaviour".

However, it should be said that the fish oils thing is still being investigated and that studies are not conclusive about omega 3 and 6 effects on behaviour and concentration. So watch this space.

We should also note that if a link is demonstrated, there then needs to be some wrangling over administration: teachers don't want to be co-opted into medical practice, fearing the effects on their relationships with parents, for example. See the article for more details.  Politically, there is some support for that caution. Sarah Teather, the Liberal Democrat education spokeswoman, added: "It is important to provide parents with the information they need, but that is a far cry from compulsory mass medication. There is a danger the government is trying to use such studies to divert attention from their failure to provide a good education for all our children."

As for me, I will be interested professionally, it reminds me to be prepared to ask dietary questions of the people I soulbefriend, supervise or teach ...

Creative problem solving

It seems that there are distinct prior brain states associated with solving or not solving a problem.
two brain imaging techniques yielded highly similar results and showed a different pattern of brain activity prior to problems that they subsequently solved with an “Aha!”, compared to the pattern of brain activity prior to problems they solved more methodically.

So I imagine that in the next year or two we will be inundated with techniques and technologies that will claim to be able to put us into the right state. In fact, I suspect that the NLP anchoring technique will probably be cannibalised quite a lot to do so. So what is the practical difference between the states and how can we change state? Well, it depends on the kind of solution.
“…preparation that led to more methodical solutions involved increased neural activity in the visual cortex at the back of the brain — suggesting that preparation for deliberate problem solving simply involved external focus of attention on the video monitor on which the problem would be displayed.” Which seems to indicate the possibility of ‘preparation for meditation’ sorts of techniques particularly ones that involve visual things.

On the other hand, “Mental preparation that led to insight solutions was generally characterized by increased brain activity in temporal lobe areas associated with conceptual processing, and with frontal lobe areas associated with cognitive control or “top-down” processing. Jung-Beeman noted that “Problem solvers could use cognitive control to switch their train of thought when stuck on a problem, or possibly to suppress irrelevant thoughts, such as those related to the previous problem.” Which may suggest exercises in focus and letting go might be productive. As it is there are few better clues as to precisely what might be helpful, “We have begun to understand how the brain prepares for creative insight. This will hopefully lead to techniques for facilitating it.”

Referenced article

Conversion and identification

This is not a research-based thing, rather an informal observation. Though it would be interesting to research it…

There is a tendency for Christian basics courses to be arenas where people learn the basic narrative structures of conversion and how to identify things in their life that can be pulled out and conform to that structure. I’ve observed this in confirmation and baptism preparation where people are encouraged to write a ‘testimony’. When they have pretty much grown up “in the fear and nurture of the Lord”, they are often/sometimes coached into traditional before-and-after conversion narratives which are partial and gave significance to aspects of their lives and fail to value other ‘less fitting’ things which probably would have been seen differently in a larger narrative arc.

The difficulty in all this set story line testimony, is that it blinds us to what may really be going on and so makes us more and more out of touch with what the Spirit may be doing to draw people to Christ.

I don’t think people are being dishonest when they tell their story through the narrative framework they inherit, they see themselves as telling the truth. However there may be more they could incorporate bit the/a fuller tale might be more awkward to fit the standard narrative framework and perhaps less dramatic. The work of spiritual guidance [”direction”, “soul friendship”] is often about recovering and integrating ‘lost’ narrative episodes or learning to pay attention to meetings with God that fall outside of the theological or devotional framework we norm [usually unconsciously and often we respond with joy to widening it].

It’s why I think that we need people with ’spiritual director’ instincts involved in evangelism among spiritual seekers: such people are not so interested in a particular narrative being reproduced in someone’s life, but rather in discovering what the Spirit is doing, noticing it and affirming connections betweeen that and Christ. Ben Campbell Johnson’s “Speaking of God: Evangelism as initial spiritual guidance” is a good intro to the idea.

Peacemaking and flame wars

According to recent research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I’ve only a 50-50 chance of ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message. The study also shows that people think they’ve correctly interpreted the tone of e-mails they receive 90 percent of the time. (Quoted in Wired News)

In other words we are very bad at accurately reading the emotional tone of written communication. Or, put it another way, we are very bad at writing in such a way as to accurately convey our emotional tone. Actually, this is no surprise: good novelists are good because, often, they are able to use words and only words on a page and punctuation to convey well moods and emotional atmospheres. Most of us are not so gifted, but we think we are.

Do an experiment.
Look back at some of your written stuff from, say, six months ago. What emotional tone does it convey? Is that what you intended? Try it again with several items, same test. I bet there’s at least some stuff that either you are not sure about what emotional tone was in your mind, let alone intended or that shocks you because it seems well awry of what you know of your own attitudes and reactions. Scary, eh?

All of which leads us into an ethics of communication. Recognising both our own frailty [ie naffness in communicating especially in print] and the likelihood that other people are, on average, as naff as we are at it, what are the rules of thumb we should put in place to make practical policy of that troublesome saying of Jesus about specks and beams in eyes, and of the golden rule of “do as you’d be done by“?

I suggest:
-Always assume that you may be misinterpreted and so on sensitive matters be extra careful, re-read and try to head off potential misunderstandings.
-Make use of the preview button [This is the one I have the most difficulty remembering] If possible come back later to look at things with fresher eyes.Always assume [or act as if you assume] that other people don’t actually mean to be nasty. If you are wrong, at least you will have the moral high ground by appearing to be gracious and generous! [Like the apostle Paul’s burning coals thing]
-Give gracious feed back and ask for clarification before “letting them have it with both barrels”. That is, tell them “When you wrote ‘blah…’, it came over to me as ‘ouch…’, is that what you intended?”

I’ve fallen foul of nearly all of those things, so it is advice born in the crucible of heated tempers and frayed respect, however I do hope that I have been learning.

25 June 2006

Our Grip On Reality Is Slim

Further experimental evidence of the way that memory works with a good dash of imagination and various reality checks:
Our work has implications for the validity of witness statements and agrees with other studies that show that our mind sometimes fills in memory gaps for us, and we confuse what we imagined occurred in a situation - which is related to what we expect to happen or what usually happens - with what actually happened.

This is the 'space' that illusionists sometimes work with and also allows cold reading and similar 'spiritual' counterfeits to take place. Of course it also gives a basis for thinking that there is something in false memory syndrome. What I find interesting is to note how, essentially, imagination is a facility that first and formost enables us to get a grip on reality ... that's an interesting reflection: imagination is only secondarily about making things up; firstly it is about being the substance of things literally unseen. Here is the neurological basis for the idea that we have to have faith in order to know stuff: we have to rely on imagination filling in the gaps in order to observe and recall properly: raw data is polyfillered. That may not be quite the same as pre-interpreted, though, it's more dialogical than that.
ScienceDaily: Our Grip On Reality Is Slim, Says University College London Scientist:
Filed in: , , , , ,

24 June 2006

Care-ful and Car-less

It's been a period when writing has been fruitful. My article on car-free ministry was published very recently in Borderlands a it's about, well here's the blurb that goes with the copy I've lodged at ourmedia [just click on the title of this post for your own copy ...
Exploration of Christian ministry from a non-driver's perspective. And, in a global-warming world, exploring the ethical and missional aspects.


Amongst other things I argue that the issue of how we, the churches, respond to global warming is as important is the slave trade issue in terms of the apologetic legacy we leave. I also explore the shape of ministry without a car in communities shaped by the car.
Care-ful and Car-less | Ourmedia:
Filed in: , , , , , ,

SUVs and risk

So, not only do they guzzle petrol, but they make you feel safe and this tends to increase risky driving behaviours ...
in terms of fatalities from all types of crash, SUVs are actually slightly more unsafe than passenger cars. In 1999, for every 100,000 registered vehicles in the US, there were 16.4 fatalities in passenger cars, and 17.8 in SUVs.
Filed in: , ,
New Scientist Short Sharp Science blog: SUVs and risk compensation:

Decentralised production and distribution of energy

A useful link about how decentralised energy production and disribution would be a good thing.
Climate Change Action
Filed in: , , , ,

23 June 2006

Hacked ID in USDA

Right, now if you're still sanguine about the National Identity Register, you should read this.
Social Security numbers and other information for nearly 1,500 people working for the National Nuclear Security Administration may have been compromised when a hacker gained entry to an Energy Department computer system last fall. Officials said June 12 they had learned only recently of the breach.

Okay so it is the USA, but it pretty much illustrates the point. Note how long it was before they appear to have realised something was wrong. Note how it was identity-thievable data that was copied. It's all very well having secure biometrics to tell who you are [and they aren't foolproof by the way, the error rates would mean thousands of people a day being misidentified or not identified], but if someone has diddled with the data that the biometrics then connect with you're still up the stream using your hands to paddle... and it's your fault if the data's wrong; that's what the legislation says.
Hacker breaks into USDA computer system - Security - MSNBC.com
Filed in: , , ,

Men Aggression: nature, nurture and Mothers

This could be quite helpful for those of us thinking about how to build a culture of peace.
genetics appears to be predictive only if men have hostile attitudes and fathers who never completed high school. Moreover, a genetic predisposition toward aggression could be rebuffed by a mother who nurtures her infant, suggests another study involving primates.

This research seems to suggest that educating men, especially to help them be less cynical and to enable them to develop tolerant attitudes. Making sure that mothers are able to do a good job in nurturing male children is important and so that needs to be borne in mind when looking at the effects of social policy. Taking this in with evidence about diet lacking omega 3 fats [and], it would seem that we are finding things that could help to nurture a more peaceful society: education, supporting mothers, proper diet
ScienceDaily: Why Men Are More Aggressive: What A Mother Should Know:Filed in: , , ,

Lord’s Prayer as Pattern Prayer

I had a good piece of news yesterday as I discovered a review on Jesus Creed by Scot McKnight of Praying the Pattern. For me the review was encouraging. Among other things he says:
It is the best book I’ve seen on teaching how to use the Lord’s Prayer as a pattern for prayer.... here’s what this book does: it thinks about prayer, dwells on prayer, and teaches all about prayer through the lens of the pattern of the Lord’s Prayer. Worth having.

Which is great because it means that my aims in writing it were met at least for Scot: practical ideas for actual praying using the Lord's prayer. Not to mention some solid reasons why we should take the idea of doing so seriously.
Jesus Creed � Lord’s Prayer as Pattern Prayer
Filed in: , , , ,

Come Clean

Now, I've seen a couple of sites that let you light a candle and say/write a prayer with it. Now here's one that let's you confess and offers a kind of ritual absolution [but note, the confessions may be viewable by others... so nothing to untoward]. But if we could capture the scripting of this so that it could run in a service ... It's rather fun anyhow.
Come Clean
Filed in: , , ,

Firefox gains ground

This is interesting, The total share for Firefox seems to have been about 10% in May. I think my traffic figures seemed to be showing that as their minimum. But I've noticed of late that the figures are nearer 30% for June ...
Firefox gains ground in May, but only just
Filed in: , ,

C.U.S.T.A.R.D.

Citizens Using Standard Time And Real DaylightC.U.S.T.A.R.D.:
Daylight Saving Time is deceitful, disruptive, and silly. It's a mass delusion, a demonstration of our unfortunate predilection for following rules and abstract concepts blindly while ignoring the evidence of our senses and the dictates of our bodies. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it started as a performance art piece intended to test the willingness of the public to accept the absurd.

;-)

They have a point.

Muslims in Britain are the most anti-western in Europe

The thing is: what's this about? If you'd asked me before reading this what my guess about UK Muslim attitudes would be compared with France, Germany and Spain's Muslim minorities, I'd have said that my guess would be that UK Muslims would respond more positively. But ...
The poll found that 63% of all Britons had a favourable opinion of Muslims, down slightly from 67% in 2004, suggesting last year's London bombings did not trigger a significant rise in prejudice. Attitudes in Britain were more positive than in the US, Germany and Spain (where the popularity of Muslims has plummeted to 29%), and about the same as in France.
Less than a third of British non-Muslims said they viewed Muslims as violent, significantly fewer than non-Muslims in Spain (60%), Germany (52%), the US (45%) and France (41%).
By contrast, the poll found that British Muslims represented a "notable exception" in Europe, with far more negative views of westerners than Islamic minorities elsewhere on the continent. A significant majority viewed western populations as selfish, arrogant, greedy and immoral. Just over half said westerners were violent. While the overwhelming majority of European Muslims said westerners were respectful of women, fewer than half British Muslims agreed. Another startling result found that only 32% of Muslims in Britain had a favourable opinion of Jews, compared with 71% of French Muslims.

So what's going on? Is it that a higher proportion of UK Muslims come from backgrounds that are more defensive, less open and tolerant? That's certainly a possibility, given that the family background of the majority is poor, rural Mirpuri with a high degree of transcontinental marriages still going on. So that seems a plausible factor. And that would go with a later observation from the article.
Muslim attitudes in Britain more resembled public opinion in Islamic countries in the Middle East and Asia than elsewhere in Europe
. That would make explanations that majored on strong links to less westernised Muslim communities in Muslim majority areas strong contenders for explanatory hypotheses. So I will hold that in mind as I contemplate these figures more. Other ideas, though, would be welcome.
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Poll shows Muslims in Britain are the most anti-western in Europe:

Filed in: , , , , ,

22 June 2006

Self intro prosepoems

A while ago I was impressed by someone using a quote from Lark's Rise... as their profile; I loved the poetry of it and was challenged -not knowing it was a quote but thinking it the blogger's own- to produce my own. The effort resulted in the first stanza [which alert readers will recognise from the 'about me' on this very blog]. Now I make no claims at poetic brilliance, but actually, I'm quite pleased with them.

At a later time, for a different purpose, but with similar intent, I came up with the second. Now for the first time, they are united. If you can't figure out what things mean, ask. I might even tell.
Squallen from Celtic days refracted though Black-country-wised and wizened forebears.
Thames flowing in grandsired veins.
God Christfully inspirited this mud: a husband; a father; a priest.

Me? A growing spirit in England's north;
rooted in Albion's larger past and Europe's nearer.
Twicely 'father' and three-times 'dad'.
Yorkshire worker and Shropshire lad.
Now Tyne and tide waits for wo man, and I in tow.

St Alban's day

It has been suggested that today, the feast of the first known martyr on British soil [c.300 AD], should be the English national day and that we should have St.Alban as our patron saint rather than St.George. I support this idea. I think that a patron saint has symbolic value and would put before us the virtues of self-sacrifice, courage and love of Christ in a way that St.George on the whole does not.

Here's the collect prayer for today.
Eternal Father,
when the gospel of Christ first came to our land
you gloriously confirmed the faith of Alban
by making him the first to win a martyr's crown:
grant that, following his example,
in the fellowship of the saints
we may worship you, the living God,
and give true witness to Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Amen.


Now sign me up for the campaign to have StAlban made England's patron saint. What? There isn't one?
Morning Prayer for Thursday 22 June 2006:

ID scheme: a solution in search of a problem

Just occasionally, we come across things that 'name' something we have thought but not fully expressed. I have to say that this is one of those times:
It is widely believed the ID scheme is something that was kept in a dusty drawer at the Home Office until opportunities such as a new rabid Home Secretary or a terrorist attrocity made it politically possible to suggest. Is this ID card scheme an object of faith in the government where it doesn’t matter what it is supposed to do, since it is such a fantastic idea in and of itself? It does seem to me that this is how proponents of this scheme view it.

That's exactly how it has looked to me for ages: the fact that the justifications kept changing as soon as significant difficulties have been pointed out. The fact that the reasons my MP gives me just don't really bear scrutiny and evaporate like morning mist as you try to work out what it would mean in practice and how it would actually work. The fact that no answers are forthcoming to significant questions and there is a veil of secrecy about things that really should be in the public domain.

And I have to confess, once upon a time I shared the unreflected enthusiasm: I quite liked the idea of having a bit of plastic that could make access to services a bit easier, or that would let me travel to France, Spain, Hungary without a passport. But then I discovered the devil is really in the detail and the devilish detail in this case is the National Identity Register: a computerised record that is supposed to join up all the data and conduct electronic surveillance of me. Not only that but it carries heinous penalties for forgetting to update it and if there is an error, it's my fault -I'm guilty until proven innocent as far as I can tell. And then, given that it has all this valuable identity data attached to it, what a prize for the data hackers: there's no data source that can forever elude them. Be sure someone will find a way to steal this most lucrative of personal identity validators -there's just enough low-level corruption and incompetance in the systems that would create, maintain or service the NIR to make it likely...

I still like the idea of an ID card, provided it's voluntary, I have more control of it and provided it isn't a honeypot for data fraud using my identity.

ID in the News� Blog Archive � IT companies complain of rushed ID scheme:
Filed in: , , , ,

Quote of the week

Al Gore
Global warming deniers were the sort of people who believed "the moon landing was staged on a movie lot in Arizona or that the earth is still flat"

He went on to say something that is beginning to seem self-evidently true and worth marking.
he also accused a "small group of very well-to-do polluters" of spending millions of dollars trying to persuade the public there was still a debate to be had. It is exactly the same thing that was done by some of the tobacco companies after the doctors and scientists firmly linked lung disease to smoking."

Guardian Unlimited Politics | Special Reports | Brown meets Gore over climate change:

Divination from Emerging voices

At the risk of letting things become too viciously reflexive, I just came across an interesting bit of discussion where one of my own postings off this very blog was part of the discussion. It seemed a useful discussion and I found this comment and some of the following really helpful.
On reading Andii's blog, however, it strikes me that there is potentially a lot of overlap between Ignatian spiritual discernment and 'Divination'

That's a real challenge and yet it does seem to me potentially very fruitful. I think I need to reflect more on this over the next couple of months.
Emerging voices: Divination:
Filed in: , , , ,

Greenbelt - Worship this year

I'm really looking forward to GB this year, and seeing the worship 'menu' has really helped stoke the anticipation. If you are going, get in touch and we can arrange to have a coffee or something.
Greenbelt - Worship Section

Ad watchdog investigates Big Brother's Golden Ticket draw

My kids were convinced that this was a fix. Something Susie said or the way she said it seemed to indicate that she had thought she would be there.
"The watchdog is launching the investigation after receiving a number of complaints from viewers and newspapers claiming that the competition's eventual winner Suzie Verrico knew she was going to enter the house before she was selected, supposedly at random."

The other thing is that she was just such a likely candidate, if you'd interviewed for the part, it's hard to think of a person more likely to fit the kind of profile we'd have thought they'd have drawn up ...
MediaGuardian.co.uk | Media | Ad watchdog investigates Big Brother's Golden Ticket draw:

we all live in New Orleans now

I recently had published an article, in Borderlands journal, on 'pedestrian ministry' commending walking rather than motoring around parishes. One of my arguments was that if we do not do so, if we do not make sure that the churches are a part of the solution to climate change and its consequences, then we will bequeathe an apologetic legacy to our great godchildren which would be like what it would be today if significant sections of the church had not campaigned against the slave trade. It's that important.
The first-order problems brought on by global warming -- beach houses washing away, sure, but also crop failures, water shortages, floods, catastrophic wildfires, much more severe hurricanes, the spread of new diseases -- should freak us out and give us pause. But they are not necessarily the worst impacts we'll see.
When we mess with something as fundamental as climate, the cascading consequences will be difficult to predict, but some of them have extremely serious implications, like studies showing that climate change and habitat loss may combine to spell doom for one quarter of all the species on Earth, perhaps triggering a series of ecopunkt failures around the planet.
Indeed, one of the most needed sets of worldchanging tools are studies and stories, explanations and visions to help more people catch on quickly to the idea that climate foresight is no longer a luxury and, one way or another, we all live in New Orleans now.

I've already preached about this a few times: we need to be planning now for how we deal with refugees, food sharing, education for sustainable living ... what else should be on the curriculum we should develop. Another comparison I make is the role of the Churches in preserving learning in the dark ages. I hope we aren't facing a dark ages, but we at the least are facing significant upheavals over the next generation or three. The churches of all institutions should be able to do long-term thinking.
WorldChanging: Another World Is Here: Climate Foresight in the Times: Don't Buy Beachfront Property: Filed in: , , ,

Lord’s Prayer as Pattern Prayer

A thank you to Scot McKnight for a review of 'Praying the Pattern', and one that is largely appreciative.
Here's a chunk of what he says.
A nice, brief exposition of the Lord’s Prayer. Not overdone; nothing extravagant.
A consideration of the spiritual dynamics of the prayer as a pattern: he explores here why it matters that Jesus does not begin with confession (he calls such a pattern the ‘four spiritual laws’ pattern), etc..
A suggestion that Christians build a Lord’s Prayer organizer or scrapbook, in which sections are devoted to the various petitions and we gather and collect our thoughts and poems and pictures, etc. Quite suggestive.
A list of other suggestions for ways to use the Lord’s prayer: using stones, cards, computers.
A set of reflections on “body prayer” (Doug Pagitt has a book on this).
A clever set of suggestions on how to let the Lord’s Prayer be the guide for constructing a rule of life (Tony Jones wrote a book on this).
The book concludes with an entire set of liturgies (with an apologetic for doing such a thing) that are built on the Lord’s Prayer.
Now here’s what this book does: it thinks about prayer, dwells on prayer, and teaches all about prayer through the lens of the pattern of the Lord’s Prayer.

If that whetted your appetite and you wanted to get hold of a copy, the way that benefits me and you most is to order it from me [via Paypal]: it's cheaper and I get more of the money...
Jesus Creed � Lord’s Prayer as Pattern Prayer
Filed in: , , , ,

The Convent -should it be Big Sister?

The Convent's contemplative air, with the focus on inner development ... is pretty refreshing. Why don't the BBC put it on one of their digital channels 24 hours a day?

Now that'd be an interesting variation on Big Bro, would it not? not just edited highlights but a full 24/7 religious community ... prayers, work, ... hmmm. Well maybe.
Londonist: TV Troll: Won't Somebody Think Of The Children?:
Filed in: ,

21 June 2006

What Would Eco-cities Look Like?

Apparently the answer could be ...
shantytowns and slums as organic, self-built and largely unplanned models of this kind of efficiency:
These shanties meet many of the ideals of eco-city designers. They are high-density but low-rise; their lanes and alleys are largely pedestrianised; and many of their inhabitants recycle waste materials from the wider city.
From a purely ecological perspective, shanties and their inhabitants are a good example of the new, green urban metabolism. Despite their sanitary and security failings, they often have a social vibrancy and ecological systems that get lost in most planned urban environments.
So perhaps something can be taken from the chaos and decentralised spontaneity embodied in shanties, and combined with the planned infrastructure of a designed eco-city...The key is to put people and ecology joint first.

If this is right, then it's yet another example of how salvation comes from below ...
WorldChanging: Another World Is Here: What Would Eco-cities Look Like?:Filed in: , , , , , ,

nuclear power is "the ultimate stealth tax"

“Every UK citizen is already paying over £1,500 to clean up the nuclear waste of the last 50 years – and that bill regularly gets revised upwards.

And in an email from the Lib Dems there was this interesting thought experiment:
Predicting the next 100,000 years isn't easy. Even the best efforts of scientists and Sci-Fi writers from just thirty years ago to predict the twenty-first century often look embarrassing wrong.
Yet that's how long waste from nuclear power stations has to be kept safe.
Just think how long 100,000 years really is. If the Victorians, or the Tudors, or Norman the Conqueror, or the Vikings, or cavemen had had nuclear power ... we would still be looking after their waste. Do you really think it would have been kept safe during all that time?


Liberal Democrats : Campbell warns nuclear power is "the ultimate stealth tax":

Learning Lord's praying on Squidoo

I'm hoping to gather together courses and learning aids to do with the Lord's prayer. I'd love to hear from anyone who has some recommendations ...
Learning Lord's praying on Squidoo

Learning Lord's praying on Squidoo

I'm hoping to gather together courses and learning aids to do with the Lord's prayer. I'd love to hear from anyone who has some recommendations ...
Learning Lord's praying on Squidoo

The Lords Prayer - Lent Course

This looks really helpful as a resource for helping people to explore the Lord's prayer. It's set up as a Lent course. The disadvantage of that is that the five sections of the prayer have to be collapsed into four in order to allow and introductory session. The collapsed clauses are the daily bread and the forgiveness ones. Perhaps it works well like that but I suspect that these would be better separated out. Perhaps the intro should be done in another way? Further thoughts welcom.
The Lords Prayer - Lent Course
Filed in: , , , , ,

New glacier theory on Stonehenge

This could disappoint a few theories from the same league as Erich Von Daniken's tales of spacefaring 'gods'.
"Glaciers may move very slowly, but they have an excellent record when it comes to the transport of large stones from one part of the country to another."

But, I have to say it looks more likely. The interesting thing still remains to ask whether these all were deposited on Salisbury plain in close proximity to Stonehenge or whether there still had to be some ingenious transporting, albeit from closer by.
BBC NEWS | UK | Wales | South West Wales | New glacier theory on Stonehenge:
Filed in: , , , ,

Virtual Farmer's Market

an eBay for local food, putting buyer and seller into direct contact and cutting out middlemen:

Local farmers will be able to post what they have to sell, such as fresh produce and meats. Buyers will be able to browse through the offerings and make online purchases from the farmers. Greenleaf will charge sellers a fee, perhaps 2% of a sale. Buyers will pay an annual subscription fee, that hasn't been finalized, to use the service. Buyers and sellers will be responsible for making their own arrangements for payments and deliveries. Hilleren said she will stay out of the transactions as much as possible.

This appears to be an ingenius, simple tool. Both buyer and seller can get precisely what they want, in the quantity they want, directly from the source.

This could be the real threat to supermarkets!

Work less do more

I record this because it's fascinating and pertinent to life today in so many ways.
They thought about it and decided they’d rather hold the team together. So we went down to a thirty-two-hour-a-week schedule for everyone furing a down time. We took everybody’s hours and salary down - executives too.
... two surprises.
First, productivity did not decline. I swear to God we get as much out of them at thirty-two hours as we did at forty. So it’s not a bad business decision. But second, when economic conditions improved, we offered them one hundred percent time again. No one wanted to go back!

I can't help saying that I could really relate to that. I've been partially employed for two years now and I love that fact that I have time to do things I like. We may not be rich in money terms but we do get by. When it comes to the prospect of more normal employment, I am most dreading the long stints at one kind of work, the loss of variety and the loss of control over my own time. I can't help suspecting that those may be the kinds of issues for the people in that study.
Via Worldchanging.
Positive Sharing � The cult of overwork (again):
Filed in: , , ,

The Myth of Religious Superiority

Just read this and posted a brief review at my booklogging site. May expand on it in due course. It's given me a lot to think about.
booklogging: The Myth of Religious Superiority

19 June 2006

TM or just M?

This is one of my 'someone else saying what I've been saying' posts [also here and in a way, here].
I’ve not been a regular meditator for many years. But I can drop my blood pressure significantly if I use my mantra for five minutes in a doctor’s office. And I can use it to help me get to sleep. YMMV, as they say in the car ads.
But is there anything special about the TM mantra? That’s a question this study does not address. What if any short nonsense word works? Or if a non-nonsense word works? If so, then it’s not “TM” that’s helping. Just “M.”

In fact, theistic meditation scores better still.
Transcendental Meditation :: TM Survey?:Filed in: , , ,

take off your trousers, they're offending our sponsor

I am not amused, in fact I'm annoyed by this. If it had been a governmental thing, people would have been rightly outraged by the fascist-seeming action, but it's about commercial sponsorship, so it's okay. What am I on about?
Critics say the decision to make more than 1,000 Dutch fans strip off last Friday is evidence of the extraordinary lengths to which Fifa has gone to protect the interests of World Cup sponsors - at the expense of ordinary fans. Fifa, however, says it has done nothing wrong and is entitled to defend itself against what it calls "ambush marketing".

I say "tough luck corporate sponsors", money shouldn't be able to buy the right to subject people to this kind of indignity. At the very least these people should have been offered alternative netherwear. In fact I think they should sue the sponsor who insisted on this and campaign to boycott their wares. So watch out Budweiser, I'm off Bud now.

I'm afraid ambush marketting may not be nice, but corporations are going to have to recognise that mental space and civil liberties are tied up with one another. There are issues in here that concern Christians: freedom of conscience is involved, loving neighbours does not involve humiliating them especially for such trivial reasons. More importantly, where could this kind of control freakery end? Potentially the same arguments could be used to strip Christians of faith symbols or to censure such things as crossing oneself. It only takes corporations to become aware of how radically anti-consumerist Christianity can be and for that to be in the public mind somewhat and we will be suspect in public life where sponsorship and the right to propagandise are being bought and sold ... we will be a threat to their messages and to the anthropology and to the life-purpose they wish to construe for human beings through the connotations and implicatures of their brands, messages and use of symbol. Too hyped? Too 'thin-end-of-the wedge'? Maybe, but then so many big things have grown up from little origins that no-one thought could lead where they did.

Guardian Unlimited Football | World Cup 2006 | The new World Cup rule: take off your trousers, they're offending our sponsor:
Filed in: , , ,

Evangelical Shifts

I've been thinking lately that the term evangelical now seems so firmly associated with knee-jerk reactionary uncharitableness that I can scarcely bring myself to take the label any more, certainly not without qualifiers like 'catholic'. So I was interested to read this.
Recently, I had a long chat with an accomplished Asian theologian who is also bishop of my ecclesiastical denomination. I lamented to him that I have often been accused of being "liberal", "slippery", or "non-evangelical" simply because I suffer a discontentment arising from what I deem to be an Evangelical bankruptcy. My theological positions often place me at the margins of Evangelicalism. He seemed to fully identify with my lament, and responded by saying, "Yes, this places us at the margins of Evangelicalism, but also at the forefront." He went on to mutter something akin to saying that there is often a price to pay for being at the forefront or an agent of change.

It's made me wonder if we need a specifically evangelical equivalent of the 'progressive Christian network'; a progressive evangelical commonweal ...
Filed in: , , Generous Orthodoxy ThinkTank: Evangelical Shifts:

18 June 2006

USA football spectacular

I can hardly believe it. A day after the USA football team [that's the one that plays the game that uses feet most - 'football' that's mostly about throwing and carrying a ball doesn't merit the name] played Italy and I still haven't come across an appreciation for the fluid and beautiful game they largely played. Okay, they didn't beat Italy, but they didn't lose either and given that Italy are a legacy great football side the USA boys did well. In fact they deserved to win. Especially as an overzealous referee robbed them of a player and they ended up playing with one man less and still gave the Italians a run around. Your guys played good, flowing, gutsy football, nearly won and your press seems to be silent. ...

Why do I care? Because I want the USA to join the rest of the world. This national downgrading of 'soccer' is like US foreign policy; tending to isolationism. The talking up of merely local games it 'world series' etc smacks of hubris. Come on USA, you can do this game well, give it your support.
See also

"Spend and tax" not "tax and spend"

 I got a response from my MP which got me kind of mad. You'll see why as I reproduce it here. Apologies for the strange changes in types...